..on signs of intended ruin
I started my series on Einstein's doctrine of the bubble universe by asking questions. Today I have answered these questions by myself (after I got hostile silence from everywhere): Physics of the bubble universe exist only for political reasons. - Einstein did not only establish the (wrong) idea of the bubble universe. He also established the required ideological filter bubble (with the help of his connection to a global force and its media power).
So, anyone who asks will gain uncomprehending silence in response. – And it is for ever. It is a touchstone: When they can make the world believe, a bubble is the right place to live in, they can dominate humanity by all accounts.
Short URL of this page: ow.ly/XhuJ307kdk4
All the basic physics of cosmology summarized in three pages. It's the essence of my main work 'Demiurg Albert E.' – under omission of political backgrounds and sociology.
A nature.com article culminates in this: Physicists who stay with their axiom the Universe is spatially infinite can't be called scientists anymore. On the grounds that they can't proof space is infinite. – That is totalitarianism (and nonsense).
Expansion of the universe is about (dark) energy and "momentum of matter"? - Adam Riess is contracted by the Johns Hopkins University to repeat the same prevarications again and again. – Just to hide the forbidden truth.
The discussion on "post-truth" is actually not about fake but about the broken monopoly on fake. Physics of the bubble universe are not accidentally wrong. Is perhaps the standard model of cosmology itself the origin of fake physics?
1. Analyse der fachlichen Fehler der Einsteinschen Fundamentalphysik des Universums und deren politische Ursachen. 2. Wie diese Sackgasse im Wissenschaftsbetrieb festgeschrieben wird. (it's in German)
The sources and goals of US science policy. – Where Einstein was wrong in fundamental physics. – You can bend light by gravity but you can't retract light once emitted back to its source. – There is no "gravity of the universe".
My scientific papers at viXra.org about the philosophical foundations of the limitless universe and about its implications for post-Einstein fundamental physics.
Part III-IV about Einstein's hypothesis of the bubble universe.
EINSTEIN WAS WRONG. BUT TODAY'S ASTROPHYSICISTS FLOP No one can conceive where time comes from and what time really is. – Makes it any sense to come up with the idea there must be an energy that drives scaling of space forward?
Is it really enough to take distance measurements of supernovae or to deduce the distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud to claim: "That's the key to unerstand expansion of the universe." ? – My skeptical first questioning (a draft).